<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What are LBC and Jeni Barnett afraid of?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scepticsbook.com/2009/02/06/what-are-lbc-and-jeni-barnett-afraid-of/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scepticsbook.com/2009/02/06/what-are-lbc-and-jeni-barnett-afraid-of/</link>
	<description>Contains Reason. Not Excuses.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 04:02:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Maggie</title>
		<link>http://scepticsbook.com/2009/02/06/what-are-lbc-and-jeni-barnett-afraid-of/comment-page-1/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scepticsbook.com/?p=377#comment-213</guid>
		<description>Hi NeilC, 

What a breath of fresh air you are, and also so right!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi NeilC, </p>
<p>What a breath of fresh air you are, and also so right!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NeilC</title>
		<link>http://scepticsbook.com/2009/02/06/what-are-lbc-and-jeni-barnett-afraid-of/comment-page-1/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>NeilC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 10:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scepticsbook.com/?p=377#comment-211</guid>
		<description>Even if the poster above really did lose a son and even if it was caused by a vaccination, it still wouldn&#039;t make vaccination a bad thing since vaccinations prevent many more deaths. It would not be a reason to recommend that other parents avoid vaccinations.

We have methods infititely more reliable than personal stories for ascertaining the risks and rewards of medical treatments. it is a stupidly irresponsible to effectively dish out medical advice based on anecdote rather than the entire evidence body properly evaluated.

I wonder if the same people would tell kids that it&#039;s OK to take crack and drink heavily on the basis that their kid did it and now he&#039;s a healthy, successful adult?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if the poster above really did lose a son and even if it was caused by a vaccination, it still wouldn&#8217;t make vaccination a bad thing since vaccinations prevent many more deaths. It would not be a reason to recommend that other parents avoid vaccinations.</p>
<p>We have methods infititely more reliable than personal stories for ascertaining the risks and rewards of medical treatments. it is a stupidly irresponsible to effectively dish out medical advice based on anecdote rather than the entire evidence body properly evaluated.</p>
<p>I wonder if the same people would tell kids that it&#8217;s OK to take crack and drink heavily on the basis that their kid did it and now he&#8217;s a healthy, successful adult?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeni Barnett&#8217;s MMR scaremongering - the role of homeopathy &#171; gimpy&#8217;s blog</title>
		<link>http://scepticsbook.com/2009/02/06/what-are-lbc-and-jeni-barnett-afraid-of/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeni Barnett&#8217;s MMR scaremongering - the role of homeopathy &#171; gimpy&#8217;s blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 10:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scepticsbook.com/?p=377#comment-83</guid>
		<description>[...] Dr Rachie of The Sceptics’ Book: What are LBC and Jeni Barnett afraid of? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dr Rachie of The Sceptics’ Book: What are LBC and Jeni Barnett afraid of? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeni Barnett admits that she failed to act as a responsible broadcaster, following ridiculous LBC broadcast about MMR: Updated several times &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://scepticsbook.com/2009/02/06/what-are-lbc-and-jeni-barnett-afraid-of/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeni Barnett admits that she failed to act as a responsible broadcaster, following ridiculous LBC broadcast about MMR: Updated several times &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scepticsbook.com/?p=377#comment-75</guid>
		<description>[...] Dr Rachie of The Sceptics&#8217; Book: What are LBC and Jeni Barnett afraid of? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dr Rachie of The Sceptics&#8217; Book: What are LBC and Jeni Barnett afraid of? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggie</title>
		<link>http://scepticsbook.com/2009/02/06/what-are-lbc-and-jeni-barnett-afraid-of/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scepticsbook.com/?p=377#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, I will need &quot;closeure&quot; on this before I can comment further. Thanks Dave. A penis you say? Interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, I will need &#8220;closeure&#8221; on this before I can comment further. Thanks Dave. A penis you say? Interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave The Happy Singer</title>
		<link>http://scepticsbook.com/2009/02/06/what-are-lbc-and-jeni-barnett-afraid-of/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave The Happy Singer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scepticsbook.com/?p=377#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Although the last comment presents with many symptoms of the anti-science mob, I suspect this specific example may in fact be a troll, since it is signed &#039;Anne Coulter&#039;.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ann_Coulter&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ann Coulter&lt;/a&gt; is an unspeakably frightful hardcore right-wing Christianist. Rumours that she also has a penis are as yet unconfirmed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although the last comment presents with many symptoms of the anti-science mob, I suspect this specific example may in fact be a troll, since it is signed &#8216;Anne Coulter&#8217;.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ann_Coulter" rel="nofollow">Ann Coulter</a> is an unspeakably frightful hardcore right-wing Christianist. Rumours that she also has a penis are as yet unconfirmed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
