<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Channel 7 and the anti-vaxers; the story so far.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scepticsbook.com/2009/04/29/anti-vaxers-the-story-so-far/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scepticsbook.com/2009/04/29/anti-vaxers-the-story-so-far/</link>
	<description>Contains Reason. Not Excuses.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:23:59 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Skep dick</title>
		<link>http://scepticsbook.com/2009/04/29/anti-vaxers-the-story-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-9382</link>
		<dc:creator>Skep dick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 12:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scepticsbook.com/?p=1124#comment-9382</guid>
		<description>Very interesting to read these through. 
I seriously don&#039;t know why someone doesn&#039;t have a proper debate through a chanel like ABCs question show or something along those lines. Channel 7 is garbage. Anyone who watches today tonight, ACA or Sunday night wouldn&#039;t know good journalism if it hit them over the head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting to read these through.<br />
I seriously don&#8217;t know why someone doesn&#8217;t have a proper debate through a chanel like ABCs question show or something along those lines. Channel 7 is garbage. Anyone who watches today tonight, ACA or Sunday night wouldn&#8217;t know good journalism if it hit them over the head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Parents refuse chemotherapy for mud treatment.</title>
		<link>http://scepticsbook.com/2009/04/29/anti-vaxers-the-story-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-5754</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Parents refuse chemotherapy for mud treatment.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scepticsbook.com/?p=1124#comment-5754</guid>
		<description>[...] This story was covered on Channel 7s Sunday Night programme, the same one that covered the death of Dana McCaffery and the anti-vaxers back in April. You can read my previous blogs about this here and here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This story was covered on Channel 7s Sunday Night programme, the same one that covered the death of Dana McCaffery and the anti-vaxers back in April. You can read my previous blogs about this here and here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mddawson</title>
		<link>http://scepticsbook.com/2009/04/29/anti-vaxers-the-story-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-1689</link>
		<dc:creator>mddawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 03:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scepticsbook.com/?p=1124#comment-1689</guid>
		<description>Recent articles into autism research:

Vitamin D deficiency: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=vitamin-d-and-autism

Enlarged Amygdala:
http://www.opposingviews.com/articles/research-toddlers-with-autism-have-enlarged-amygdala-in-brain

Testosterone in womb: http://www.nhs.uk/news/2009/01January/Pages/Autismscreening.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recent articles into autism research:</p>
<p>Vitamin D deficiency: <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=vitamin-d-and-autism" rel="nofollow">http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=vitamin-d-and-autism</a></p>
<p>Enlarged Amygdala:<br />
<a href="http://www.opposingviews.com/articles/research-toddlers-with-autism-have-enlarged-amygdala-in-brain" rel="nofollow">http://www.opposingviews.com/articles/research-toddlers-with-autism-have-enlarged-amygdala-in-brain</a></p>
<p>Testosterone in womb: <a href="http://www.nhs.uk/news/2009/01January/Pages/Autismscreening.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.nhs.uk/news/2009/01January/Pages/Autismscreening.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggie</title>
		<link>http://scepticsbook.com/2009/04/29/anti-vaxers-the-story-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-1673</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 13:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scepticsbook.com/?p=1124#comment-1673</guid>
		<description>@AndyD,

I had a very brief look at PubMed and found a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18425890?ordinalpos=3&amp;itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cochrane Review&lt;/a&gt; from April 2008.

AUTHORS&#039; CONCLUSIONS: Research has shown of high rates of use of complementary and alternative therapies (CAM) for children with autism including gluten and/or casein exclusion diets. Current evidence for efficacy of these diets is poor. Large scale, good quality randomised controlled trials are needed.

I will need to read the rest of the review more thoroughly, but what is clear is that &quot;the included trials did not share common outcome measures and therefore no meta-analysis was possible&quot;. 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@AndyD,</p>
<p>I had a very brief look at PubMed and found a <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18425890?ordinalpos=3&#038;itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum" rel="nofollow">Cochrane Review</a> from April 2008.</p>
<p>AUTHORS&#8217; CONCLUSIONS: Research has shown of high rates of use of complementary and alternative therapies (CAM) for children with autism including gluten and/or casein exclusion diets. Current evidence for efficacy of these diets is poor. Large scale, good quality randomised controlled trials are needed.</p>
<p>I will need to read the rest of the review more thoroughly, but what is clear is that &#8220;the included trials did not share common outcome measures and therefore no meta-analysis was possible&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndyD</title>
		<link>http://scepticsbook.com/2009/04/29/anti-vaxers-the-story-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-1671</link>
		<dc:creator>AndyD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 09:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scepticsbook.com/?p=1124#comment-1671</guid>
		<description>Dr Rachie, could you comment on the latest blog link (or whatever it&#039;s called) from &quot;Unique Autism Experiments...&quot; above? It links to a page apparently pushing the GFCF (gluten-free, casein-free) diet which I thought had been pretty much debunked as a treatment for autism. Is there new science here or is this the same old &quot;solution&quot; that&#039;s been bandied about for a while?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr Rachie, could you comment on the latest blog link (or whatever it&#8217;s called) from &#8220;Unique Autism Experiments&#8230;&#8221; above? It links to a page apparently pushing the GFCF (gluten-free, casein-free) diet which I thought had been pretty much debunked as a treatment for autism. Is there new science here or is this the same old &#8220;solution&#8221; that&#8217;s been bandied about for a while?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unique Autism Experiments Offer Parents Hope</title>
		<link>http://scepticsbook.com/2009/04/29/anti-vaxers-the-story-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-1626</link>
		<dc:creator>Unique Autism Experiments Offer Parents Hope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 09:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scepticsbook.com/?p=1124#comment-1626</guid>
		<description>[...] » Channel 7 and the anti-vaxers; the story so far. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] » Channel 7 and the anti-vaxers; the story so far. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vaccines and formaldehyde &#171; Science Notes</title>
		<link>http://scepticsbook.com/2009/04/29/anti-vaxers-the-story-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-1582</link>
		<dc:creator>Vaccines and formaldehyde &#171; Science Notes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 03:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scepticsbook.com/?p=1124#comment-1582</guid>
		<description>[...] event that inspired the writer to research formaldehyde and anti-vaccine sentiment was the death of a small baby in Australia from whooping cough (pertussis). She was too young to be vaccinated but if the people around her were vaccinated [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] event that inspired the writer to research formaldehyde and anti-vaccine sentiment was the death of a small baby in Australia from whooping cough (pertussis). She was too young to be vaccinated but if the people around her were vaccinated [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wombatwal</title>
		<link>http://scepticsbook.com/2009/04/29/anti-vaxers-the-story-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-1534</link>
		<dc:creator>wombatwal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 03:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scepticsbook.com/?p=1124#comment-1534</guid>
		<description>Missed the show last night but just saw it on the internet.
I was very dissapointed in the Professor when he was specifically asked about the risks in vaccination he completely ignored this and spoke about the success of vaccination. This sort of answering does not help the general public in making up there minds objectively if to vaccinate or not.
The whole show was light weight, I suppose all you can expect from the commercial TV rubbish stations we have in this country.
The professor did not challenge the anti vaccers, he did not give any good arguments in favour of vaccination. I thought he was hopeless.
The women GP anti vaccer was just as hopeless if not more so, she had nothing to say.
I was very dissapointed. Total waste of effort I thought.
This could have been a good forum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Missed the show last night but just saw it on the internet.<br />
I was very dissapointed in the Professor when he was specifically asked about the risks in vaccination he completely ignored this and spoke about the success of vaccination. This sort of answering does not help the general public in making up there minds objectively if to vaccinate or not.<br />
The whole show was light weight, I suppose all you can expect from the commercial TV rubbish stations we have in this country.<br />
The professor did not challenge the anti vaccers, he did not give any good arguments in favour of vaccination. I thought he was hopeless.<br />
The women GP anti vaccer was just as hopeless if not more so, she had nothing to say.<br />
I was very dissapointed. Total waste of effort I thought.<br />
This could have been a good forum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean the Blogonaut</title>
		<link>http://scepticsbook.com/2009/04/29/anti-vaxers-the-story-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-1522</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean the Blogonaut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 13:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scepticsbook.com/?p=1124#comment-1522</guid>
		<description>No it was a spelling mistake which I noticed three times yet still managed to miss changing.

I have read your comments.  I think we would have benefited from you articulating your case in in one coherent post.  

I found the debate(on the TV) to pretty ho hum myself, I don&#039;t think it did anyone any good or made it clearer for anyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No it was a spelling mistake which I noticed three times yet still managed to miss changing.</p>
<p>I have read your comments.  I think we would have benefited from you articulating your case in in one coherent post.  </p>
<p>I found the debate(on the TV) to pretty ho hum myself, I don&#8217;t think it did anyone any good or made it clearer for anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louise</title>
		<link>http://scepticsbook.com/2009/04/29/anti-vaxers-the-story-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-1517</link>
		<dc:creator>Louise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 13:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scepticsbook.com/?p=1124#comment-1517</guid>
		<description>Have to be brief in my reply because i&#039;m so tired my eyes are dry and closing....
I began a law degree whilst pregnant with my first child at the age of 19 and completed same as a sole-parent. I also studied accounting (by correspondence) to ensure my brain didn&#039;t turn to mush after pregnancy. I know what hard work it is better than most.
I&#039;ve posted many comments about my position under &#039;A Brief Report from Today&#039;s Debate&#039;.
Seeya
P.S. I hope calling me &#039;Lousie&#039; was a joke ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have to be brief in my reply because i&#8217;m so tired my eyes are dry and closing&#8230;.<br />
I began a law degree whilst pregnant with my first child at the age of 19 and completed same as a sole-parent. I also studied accounting (by correspondence) to ensure my brain didn&#8217;t turn to mush after pregnancy. I know what hard work it is better than most.<br />
I&#8217;ve posted many comments about my position under &#8216;A Brief Report from Today&#8217;s Debate&#8217;.<br />
Seeya<br />
P.S. I hope calling me &#8216;Lousie&#8217; was a joke <img src='http://scepticsbook.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
