Comments on: Simon Singh wins right to full appeal.

By: Michael Kingsford Gray

Michael Kingsford Gray — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 05:52:50 +0000

Now that the BCA have unambiguously, clearly and intentionally libeled Simon Singh in the most materially damaging manner possible, I wonder that they bother to continue with this case at all.
The only notion that occurs as a reason is that as a body, their directors are so completely egotistical, and so utterly delusional that they somehow assume that it is acceptable for them to commit these legal travesties, scot free.
Their only plausible defense, should they not wish to admit to guilt, is to plead insanity: a very realistic path to pursue, given their attitude(s) to reality and evidence.

By: JXL55

JXL55 — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:43:30 +0000

LFTR against other fission options". ,

By: Grendel

Grendel — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 07:05:54 +0000

Yes, unlike Simon’s loss in court for the rather vague ‘bogus’ they have gone all out and described him unambiguously as ‘malicious’.

By: Sean the Blogonaut

Sean the Blogonaut — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:29:00 +0000

And now the BCA has got its knickers in a knot.

By: Dave Parker

Dave Parker — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 03:12:46 +0000

I would love to hear your thoughts on immunization and the possible (if any) connections to Autism. Is there any connection at all?

By: Chris Sol

Chris Sol — Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:20:04 +0000

Legendary