<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zap! There goes your hard earned money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scepticsbook.com/2010/01/25/zap-there-goes-your-hard-earned-money/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scepticsbook.com/2010/01/25/zap-there-goes-your-hard-earned-money/</link>
	<description>Contains Reason. Not Excuses.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:16:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Quit Smoking Cigarettes and lost 3.5 St in Weight. Hypnosis, Laser, Bioresonance. &#124;</title>
		<link>http://scepticsbook.com/2010/01/25/zap-there-goes-your-hard-earned-money/comment-page-1/#comment-9078</link>
		<dc:creator>I Quit Smoking Cigarettes and lost 3.5 St in Weight. Hypnosis, Laser, Bioresonance. &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scepticsbook.com/?p=2663#comment-9078</guid>
		<description>[...] Zap! There goes your hard earned money [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Zap! There goes your hard earned money [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggie</title>
		<link>http://scepticsbook.com/2010/01/25/zap-there-goes-your-hard-earned-money/comment-page-1/#comment-8988</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scepticsbook.com/?p=2663#comment-8988</guid>
		<description>@reasonable hank, That deserves a blog post of it&#039;s own. Hilarious!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@reasonable hank, That deserves a blog post of it&#8217;s own. Hilarious!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reasonablehank</title>
		<link>http://scepticsbook.com/2010/01/25/zap-there-goes-your-hard-earned-money/comment-page-1/#comment-8987</link>
		<dc:creator>reasonablehank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scepticsbook.com/?p=2663#comment-8987</guid>
		<description>I believe in the BICOM.

I also believe in this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVUfLJVSdjg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe in the BICOM.</p>
<p>I also believe in this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVUfLJVSdjg" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVUfLJVSdjg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: weez</title>
		<link>http://scepticsbook.com/2010/01/25/zap-there-goes-your-hard-earned-money/comment-page-1/#comment-8985</link>
		<dc:creator>weez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scepticsbook.com/?p=2663#comment-8985</guid>
		<description>If you couple two AC waveforms that are precisely 180 degrees out of phase into a single load, the resultant voltage is ZERO- &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; the waveform shown over the silhouette of the patient. 

Got that? ZERO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you couple two AC waveforms that are precisely 180 degrees out of phase into a single load, the resultant voltage is ZERO- <i>not</i> the waveform shown over the silhouette of the patient. </p>
<p>Got that? ZERO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndyD</title>
		<link>http://scepticsbook.com/2010/01/25/zap-there-goes-your-hard-earned-money/comment-page-1/#comment-8910</link>
		<dc:creator>AndyD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scepticsbook.com/?p=2663#comment-8910</guid>
		<description>Off topic (though it&#039;s good to see this article back again), it&#039;s interesting that you haven&#039;t posted one article about the Shorties. Not a plea for votes. Not a whine about your alt-med opponents. Not even a response to the insults hurled your way.
.
The others could learn a lot from you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Off topic (though it&#8217;s good to see this article back again), it&#8217;s interesting that you haven&#8217;t posted one article about the Shorties. Not a plea for votes. Not a whine about your alt-med opponents. Not even a response to the insults hurled your way.<br />
.<br />
The others could learn a lot from you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ilijas</title>
		<link>http://scepticsbook.com/2010/01/25/zap-there-goes-your-hard-earned-money/comment-page-1/#comment-8904</link>
		<dc:creator>ilijas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scepticsbook.com/?p=2663#comment-8904</guid>
		<description>a prong and a stupid meter that does nothing.... god is it really *that* easy to deceive people? 

or, more to the point, are consumers that ill-informed, and so many unscrupulous &quot;practitioners&quot; out there exploiting that? 

i wonder what kind of spin the proponents of this silly and useless gadget would have if properly put to the test.... oh yes, &quot;it&#039;s raining today, so it&#039;ll affect the results&quot;....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a prong and a stupid meter that does nothing&#8230;. god is it really *that* easy to deceive people? </p>
<p>or, more to the point, are consumers that ill-informed, and so many unscrupulous &#8220;practitioners&#8221; out there exploiting that? </p>
<p>i wonder what kind of spin the proponents of this silly and useless gadget would have if properly put to the test&#8230;. oh yes, &#8220;it&#8217;s raining today, so it&#8217;ll affect the results&#8221;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndyD</title>
		<link>http://scepticsbook.com/2010/01/25/zap-there-goes-your-hard-earned-money/comment-page-1/#comment-8858</link>
		<dc:creator>AndyD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scepticsbook.com/?p=2663#comment-8858</guid>
		<description>Sorry Maggie but you&#039;ve got this one wrong. Maybe as a result of your recent thrashing from Adams and Mercola you&#039;ve jumped the gun without properly assessing the evidence.
.
We know that quack treatments usually target either toxins or chemicals. This one says it targets &lt;b&gt;both&lt;/b&gt; - in the same sentence.
.
Toxins AND Chemicals - it must be the real deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Maggie but you&#8217;ve got this one wrong. Maybe as a result of your recent thrashing from Adams and Mercola you&#8217;ve jumped the gun without properly assessing the evidence.<br />
.<br />
We know that quack treatments usually target either toxins or chemicals. This one says it targets <b>both</b> &#8211; in the same sentence.<br />
.<br />
Toxins AND Chemicals &#8211; it must be the real deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

