Comments on: AVN website suspended due to ‘legal complaint’

By: Dave The Happy Singer

Dave The Happy Singer — Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:53:14 +0000

‘A smear campaign designed to link the AVN to porn? Sounds strange and a little bit pointless to tell you the truth. I’m not sure what this is designed to achieve.’

Umm, yeah. I’d have thought it’s a basic marketing task to check that you don’t choose the same name as the world’s biggest porn awards for your business.

If the AVN are linked to porn, there’s no-one to blame except Meryl.

By: Dr Aust

Dr Aust — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:33:35 +0000

Isn’t AVN also the standard abbreviation for the house organ (pun intended) of the porn biz, Adult Video News? Perhaps someone somewhere got the wrong ‘nym.

Though doubtless any card-carrying anti-vaccine wingnuts will see Dark Conspiracy rather than incompetence. They always do, after all.

By: Mick

Mick — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:42:02 +0000

This is what happens when you fail to do a google (image) search before naming your organisation.

By: nudel

nudel — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 05:43:38 +0000

Although they’re back on track – I_know_users… and it’s comforting to ponder the amount of times a search for the Australian Vaccination Network will inevitably result in well meaning individuals stumbling across the Adult Video Network.

By: AndyD

AndyD — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 05:24:37 +0000

“It seems most likely that the website being suspended is a mix up”
.
Well that’s not much of a conspiracy is it? Where’s the secrecy, the subterfuge, the conniving? Where’s the tin foil or the shape-shifters?
.
The AVN site is back up today. We await the announcement from Meryl that it was all a big mistake, that the “septics” weren’t to blame and that there is was no conspiracy after all, despite what her “friend who works in the Australian media.” might think.
.
Holding breath for apology starts… now…

By: Paul

Paul — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:16:04 +0000

The arsenic, lead and elemental mercury contaminants in the herbs she loves are taking a deadly toll. Chelation must be in order.

For a Conspiracy Theorist, she’s workin’ that “Problem-Reaction-Solution” model hard. This is about the 10th loudly broadcast “problem” in as many weeks. The “reaction” will be loudly proclaimed “Poor, Wonderful, Brave, Selfless, Generous Meryl” emails – written by articulate anon impostors who sound nothing like any MEMBERS!!!!!. And the “solution” will be a call for donations.

Doesn’t this woman know a good lie needs a dash of credibility. ‘A friend in the media who knew for some time…?’

By golly! A narcissist able to reciprocate with another human being using the very interpersonal thinking she is incapable of? Fascinating! I thought criminally oriented cult leaders who “befriend” only to exploit/attack/humiliate people kinda struggle on the friend side.

And a friend in that same “sycophantic conformist” media who Meryl dissects when they publish simple realities on her criminal conduct, don’t peddle hysteria, or suggest the horror or robust health isn’t an abuse of the right to infect innocent children across Australia?

More lies. This’ll be followed by a rejigged call for funds. Much like her baby stealing gig which gave the Fighting Fund wheels – even a “Donation Challenge” – all done by anons of course.

By: AndyD

AndyD — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:39:43 +0000

Meryl’s #6 complaint is irrefutable – she did post a link to the “illuminati” article written by lizard-people conspiracy theorist David Icke. She might not have known it was by Icke since she linked to a (now deleted) copy of it published under a pseudonym but that’s irrelevant since it was a tin-foil-hat extravaganza of conspiracy with or without his name on it.
.
The article is still there on her blog with the dead link. But there’s enough there to correctly connect it with the Icke original – now moved to here.
.
So how is it ridiculous to associate her with an article she, herself, posted and linked to on her own blog without a word of dissent or disagreement. What else were we supposed to conclude but that she supported the views within it?
.
And given that the AVN’s advice puts childrens’ lives at risk every day, linking them with porn seems somewhat redundant.